Modiphius.com  |  Modiphius Shop

Bad Guys dying far to easy! Please help

Please help!!
I’m having major issues with my PCs just slaughtering things in a single round. It’s so easy for them to inflict 5 wounds on the BBG. I’m harrying them with bunches of minions, but it never fails they just slaughter the boss and then clean up.

What are other folks doing to keep their bad guys alive? I’m at my wits end.
Thanks

1 Like

I try and use the environment as a factor.
Braziers being kicked over by the bbg to single out pcs.
Squads of minions causing human barriers between the pcs and the bbg.
Both seem to work very well and can create some really nice moments in combat.
Also using doom to mimic fortune points is a great help.

1 Like

U can use (Thulsa?) Doom to add more Difficulty, by Crom!

2 Likes

Spend doom to go first & spend doom for extra d20s. Then make sure you spend doom for a secondary attack.

Try sacrificing shields and armor on the human nemesis. I’ve actually used this to good effect. It’s important to not do it with every single roll.

3 doom allows you to spend doom as a fortune point. Refill that Vigor once between attacks. Don’t keep doing it because of ridiculous factors.

Have you thrown mental damage via displays, magic, fear? Four trauma can incapacitate a pc. Might make them regroup. Certain creatures are inured to pain and don’t feel wounds. Some have obnoxious healing ability.

Edit: ignore minions at their peril! Group up 5 of them in a mob. Now surround a character and attack them with a 5d20 roll.

5 Likes

I actually give my bad guys, mainly nemesis, actual talents as well. Perhaps it takes 7 stress to get a wound. Give the bad guy riposte that allows him to attack right after a parry.

2 Likes

Something else to mention, here. This is Howardian fantasy: your combat-oriented heroes are SUPPOSED to end up hip-deep in the blood and entrails of the faceless minions you throw at them. That said, the narrative and abstract nature of movement, distance and space in Modiphius games gives you, the GM, complete control over whether the heroes can bypass the chaff to get to the “final boss”. Want to slow their advance? Doom-insert (as realistically as possible) more minions between them and the BBG. Want to wear them down? Start injecting Toughened enemies and other hazards (poisoned weapons, hidden traps, alchemical toys, etc.), too. You’re not trying to WIN; it’s not an adversarial proposition. You’re just trying to make it as entertaining and interesting as possible. At the end of the day, that’s really what matters.

3 Likes

Combat is supposed to go quickly and enemies are supposed to die quickly. Remember a few things though. Anything the heroes can to the enemies can do as well, this is especially true of bbgs. Make sure you are doing wounds right, one player should not be able to inflict 5 wounds in one round. Make sure you are adapting the difficulty of combat. The base to hit is one success but when you take into account the nature of the battlefield and the fact that the enemies are likely defending themselves it is likely to get harder to hit. Do your best to have your boss enemies plan for combat. Unless they are built for it, very few enemy bosses are going to rush to the front to be slaughtered. Easy answer is Doom. You can significantly alter the battlefield just by stealing initiative or spending doom to increase difficulty. I recently ran a combat where my players where perfectly capable of wiping the floor with the enemies but by spending 3 doom I created an impediment that made it harder for them to hit and it evened out the battlefield quite a bit. There were plenty of more subtle ways I could have changed things but I wanted the players to feel like they had accomplished something when they killed the enemy. It only added a couple rounds but with those rounds I was able to injure them quite a bit and by then end everyone was celebrating their victory like it had been one of the most deadly encounters they had ever had. If you get creative with your resources nearly every battle can be an epic, cinematic feeling encounter.

2 Likes

In REH’s Conan story “Queen of the Black Coast” Conan ran/rode away from a handful of soldiers/guardsmen who tried to (unjustly?) get him found guilty at court.
A Conan 2d20 PC would be able to simply wade through them, no need to flee from any number of guards ever, as he slays them by the score.

This is what I find often at odds to the literary source material. As a GM you have to muster up mob after mob of minions, so that after slaying - for example - 30 city watchmen the PC “hero” walks away without any scratch on him. This breaks the inner logic of the game world, I find. Such a kind of bloodshed might be expected in a great battle, a clash of armies or so. But as GM seeing the PCs “depopulate” entire areas, towns quarters or villages, that is a disbalance in power that breaks the suspension of disbelief utterly.

I ran several Conan campaigns by now, and I have played in even more as a player myself. In every campaign there is such a kind of “combat monster” PC who annihilates minions and Elite opponents in great numbers. And in some campaigns I have played such a PC myself, so I know how it feels from both sides of the table.

For a decently built - not even a maxed-out one-trick pony - combat oriented character it is way too easy to become a “being of mass destruction”. And that does not fit the source material at all.
It only fits the warped, second-hand “rumored” traits of a “typical fantasy barbarian”, it does not fit Conan according to REH’s stories.

So I would expect more sense of danger to be felt even for combat heavy created PCs than the current Conan 2d20 game delivers.
Simply making every single NPC the group encounters a Nemesis rank NPC or at least the rest of the world Elite NPCs does not really work as a fix for that problem.

4 Likes

I’m deeply interested in how this thread develops.

I ran one quickly-ended PbP of this system, and I definitely felt like I was at great straits to even touch my PCs, let alone hurt them. True, one of the PCs not only was a “combat monster” but one I had allowed the Skill Talent General, resulting in him leading a small party of Elite warriors. My own fault, since I allowed it? Perhaps. But I typically prefer players to build what they want.

Just started a face-to-face game and have run one true session. Yes, the PCs are awesome (though the players don’t seem to know this yet, not yet having fully groked the rules). But I didn’t find it mattering so much, since the focus of the main excitement entailed the PCs rescuing a victim from ravening ghouls/jackal-men. The point was that the PCs weren’t so much interested in “wading hip deep in the blood of their enemies” as they were in achieving their objection and getting (by Hades!) away.

Incidentally, after a few encounters with these creatures, for this last one I simply dumped a handful of markers—representing foes—onto the tactical battle mat. This is a weird game in that the GM serves as a traditional GM—in other words, doing whatever she wants—but also has these things called Doom spends, such as using them to bring new Minions into a scene. I did it one time, and one of my players (who runs a 1e game for me and others) asked, “What was that about? In old school games the DM just does what he wants.” This is true of 2d20 too, I know. But it’s a curious animal in which GMs enjoy both GM fiat and resources for when they feel like justifying their decisions.

All this said, I enjoy the Minion/Toughened/Nemesis rules. I think I’ll make them work well, and I’m curious about how these rules will influence the development of my campaign. I feel free to throw anything at my PCs (including handfuls of enemies). I see the criticism as valid, though.

1 Like

Well when the players are fighting the Villain or opponent you need to remind yourself that each of the PCs are all made with about the same starting points that a 15 year old Conan would start with. If the characters are all made decently they are formidable just by themselves and the game puts that feeling into the PCs pretty well.

Weapon reach in most of the stories is the Opponents main downfall but when heavily outnumbered that is a good way to balance opposition. Most of the adventures in the core book, quick start rules, and Jeweled Thrones of the Earth use most opponents with a weapon or natural attack reach of 1 which is good for some starting adventures. The higher the Opponents reach is with weapons or natural attacks the more fair combat will become since most PCs will run with a standard reach of 2 and more combative ones will gravitate towards the Spear and Greatsword with a reach of 3.

I’ve had well built combative PCs tear through Nemesis NPCs that outnumbered them. A more balanced campaign would probably use shadows of the past character creation method. I think this would bring the PCs more in line with the opposition in the printed stories.

1 Like

Interesting point about the Shadows of the Past rules. I must try that in a game some time. I think, especially for an ongoing campaign.

I am still yet to run my first session but I’ve being reading the core book (and a few supplements) like crazy for the last few weeks (I know it doesn’t worth actually GMing the whole thing). Nonetheless, I’m a bit surprised: my first game will probably be “Racing the Thunder” and I can’t see how this adventure won’t be able to challenge any character. From what I’ve read, if you want to rock at combat, you’d need Melee (Agility), Resistance (Brawn), probably Ranged weapons (Coordination) plus, being able to stand the horrors of the Hyborian world (Willpower). If the players’ characters just want to max their Melee score and hit points, they are screwed.

1 Like

I ran that one using the pregen PCs about a dozen times for groups of very different experience with RPGs in general or 2d20 games in particular. Every single time the PCs were quite difficult to challenge as the Picts are pushover minions for the most part. I suppose this is intentional not to frustrate players trying out the - at that time - new Conan 2d20 game. But nevertheless, I wouldn’t call this scenario challenging at all - unless you choose to modify it, increase the numbers, add more Toughened opponents, etc.

1 Like

I’ll have to trust you on this because you are one step ahead from me. One last thing though: there is a huge difference between what the players think as challenging and what the GM considers as a challenge. More often than not the GM would think an encounter was a bit disappointing in term of challenge while the players would deem it was quite harsh. Use Doom to disarm them, to invoke extra warriors or to make the NPCs act first at a bad time etc… Maybe you, as a GM, you will know: « okay that’s no big deal, the NPCs never had a chance » and you may be you are right but, what your players thought about that.

At the end of the day if it was a challenge for your players, you win (you made a memorable story, and you don’t want the PCs to die anyway).

I’m still to run the scenario and I’m eager to give some feedback to you based on what happened.

2 Likes

A lot of great ideas are presented above. Please remember to hold back some Mobs or Squads with Bows. Having a PC burn a Reaction trying to dodge a volley of arrows thrown at them only softens them up for the Toughened and/or Nemesis later in that round. As Feond posted above, remember Nemesis can spend 3 Doom for a Fortune Point. This works for both Attack and Defense.

2 Likes