A Question about Threat

The point is debatable, but essentially - no.

Romulan ones, yesā€¦ Klingon, no.

Nope. Just take the 1 point difficulty increase for non-lethal use of lethal weapons.

The Threat cost of lethal attacks is in line with Starfleet values of non-violent conflict resolution, values that they do not necessarily share with the kind of enemies willing to zap 'em! However, just because this thematically it fits the rules doesnā€™t mean itā€™s the reason behind those rules, so it should not be inferred that the rules do not apply to Klingon or Cardassian enemies.

Iā€™m fine with that.

If I ever run into a problem because the enemies canā€™t kill off the PCs because they have run out of Threat then Iā€™ll see what the situation allows for. Maybe the enemies call off their attack and retreat, or allow for a cease fire, or maybe through a tremendous amount of luck all their remaining attacks are non-lethal without them noticingā€¦

1 Like

coup de grace should be D0ā€¦ so they fail one, by being sloppy (doing non-lethal), but use it to build momentum to go around to the others with lethal attacksā€¦

The difference ceases to matter if the PCs are on the losing side.